Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tyler Faith (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. ( X! ·  talk )  · @059  · 00:24, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Tyler Faith
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The article does not seem to comply with any of the WP:Pornbio criteria KevinOKeeffe (talk) 21:42, 22 July 2009 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:47, 23 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete This article does not seem to comply with any of the criteria of WP:Pornbio. The single award she has apparently won was issued by a local Houston, Texas-area print publication, Nightmoves, which wouldn't seem to comply with criterion #1, while there doesn't seem to any question she doesn't meet criteria #2 through #5. KevinOKeeffe (talk) 21:50, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - WP:Pornbio is not the only deciding factor. From Additional criteria: "Failure to meet these criteria is not conclusive proof that a subject should not be included; conversely, meeting one or more does not guarantee that a subject should be included". Article itself lists other criteria for notability. Biofase flame | stalk 22:10, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - Same rationale as the keeps in the first AfD. Lots of coverage by AVN which is considered a reliable source on pornography. Morbidthoughts (talk) 00:46, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - Still notable since last time. Dismas |(talk) 01:38, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Passes GNG easily. This shouldn't have been nominated.Horrorshowj (talk) 03:08, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per meeting WP:GNG for coverage in genre-specific sources. MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 18:03, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, winning an award satisfies the notability criterium enough. -- fdewaele, 28 July 2009, 14:27.
 * Comment No, I'm sorry, but that is not correct. You have to win some sort of major, notable award, as per the WP:Pornbio criteria, which it may be helpful for you to review before voting on whether to retain porn star bio articles.  A minor, obscure award issued by a local, Houston, Texas-area, "alternative" print publication is not sufficient to achieve notability.  That is a fact simply not in dispute. KevinOKeeffe (talk) 00:05, 29 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Morbidthoughts (talk) 22:04, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.