Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tyler Harlan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE.  Rob e  rt  T 01:16, 6 November 2005 (UTC)

Tyler Harlan
Unverifiable, probably a hoax. Also see Elks on the Up and Up. Delete. Dvyost 02:36, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Why would someone bother to make such a lame hoax?  Devotchka 02:45, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as unverifiable. (And Devotchka, that's a good question. Ask one of those people who constantly engage in lame hoaxes like this...) -- Captain Disdain 08:23, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete and BJAODN. BTW shouldn't this be a CSD.--May the Force be with you! Shreshth91  ($ |-| r 3 $ |-| t |-|)  08:24, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Not necessarily. I'm all for speedying stuff that needs to be speedied, but if you're not sure that something is a hoax or non-notable, I think it's definitely better to go to AfD, because if the topic is notable, that way there's a far better chance of someone coming up with the important reference or whatnot. I tag a lot of stuff for speedy deletion under A7, but if I'd run across this one, I'd have gone to AfD myself. -- Captain Disdain 09:41, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Actually, CSD G1 explicitly says that hoaxes can't be speedied. So AfD it is... --Dvyost 19:54, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as likely hoax; non verifiable. Hall Monitor 19:44, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
 * As I noted on the book's AFD page, an author whose bio says he died in 1952 unequivocally did not write a book about anything in Nunavut, which didn't even exist until 1999. Delete hoax. Bearcat 05:16, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete hoax, as per Bearcat. Luigizanasi 05:17, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per hoax arguments. --maclean25 00:41, 5 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.