Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tyler J. Skluzacek


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:48, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Tyler J. Skluzacek

 * – ( View AfD View log  J. Skluzacek) Stats )

Non-notable, reads like personal advertisement. Article didn't qualify for creation. Seola (talk) 13:50, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
 * 

Delete I am the subject of this wikipedia article. I didn't write it, and would like to see it deleted. ADDITIONALLY---there are factual inaccuracies in this article that are grounds for deletion. tskluzac —Preceding undated comment added 02:28, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Delete Expanded discussion. The creation reason was "He's a pretty major figure in Minnesota right now.". It fails WP:N guidelines among others. Spends more time on verified information giving his background and school over the actual reason he's allegedly famous. As of now, the main notability is a failed app/failed Kickstarter and there are no recent reliable sources (including the app pages themselves) that detail any information on a realistic release, since it has gone radio silent and isn't even on the market. It fails initial notability, it fails current notability and gives no promise to future notability. Seola (talk) 14:02, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk) 17:03, 30 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - An argument might be made that the articles support the app as notable, but even that is weak. References are insufficient to support notability for the individual.--Rpclod (talk) 18:10, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 02:30, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 02:30, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 02:30, 5 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. Notability not attained yet. Xxanthippe (talk) 04:20, 5 November 2016 (UTC).
 * Delete per nom. No evidence from sources that topic meets WP:GNG. Ajpolino (talk) 04:50, 6 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.