Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tyler Lovering


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 02:04, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Tyler Lovering

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 04:31, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:03, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:03, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:03, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:04, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep clearly satisfies WP:GNG. Dan arndt (talk) 05:40, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Weak delete: the added CBC article seems really good, the Sydney Herald only mentions his role. The other sources were all stats pages and lists. I could go either way with this if there is one more reliable non-routine source for this particular player/executive. Yosemiter (talk) 15:58, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:07, 12 June 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 03:00, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete There is just not enough coverage to justify an article here. Deadman137 (talk) 03:59, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete As a player he falls far from notability. As a commissioner, Australian ice hockey is far too obscure to warrant the article on those grounds. Bill McKenna (talk) 03:27, 27 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.