Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tyler Relph


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Seeing as the arguments for notability have not been contested. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:43, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

Tyler Relph

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Previously deleted on an expired prod with a notability concern; since it's been recreated, we may as well have a discussion on rather or not Relph is actually notable. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 00:33, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @  00:33, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @  00:33, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @  00:33, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of West Virginia-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @  00:33, 5 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete a high school distinction title is not a sign of notability, and his college career is not at a notable level either.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:38, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment my question: was it enough to be Mr. Basketball in a state like New York? There is much RS to meet GNG. Lightburst (talk) 01:16, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Passes WP:GNG with the sources already in the article. Dammit_steve (talk) 10:54, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Meets GNG with enough sources in article. ~ EDDY  ( talk / contribs )~ 16:17, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - has enough significant coverage to meet GNG. Rlendog (talk) 18:41, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. Meets WP:GNG and WP:BASIC, per the sources already in the article. Ejgreen77 (talk) 05:58, 12 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.