Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tympanic Theatre Company


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete - no coverage in reliable secondary sources, fails WP:CORP. Black Kite 10:24, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

Tympanic Theatre Company

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I speedy deleted this as a non notable organization, but it was recreated without significant improvement. On the web, I see only press releases and stuff from the group. I got no Google news hits. Sources in article are form the company itself. Not notable as not having significant media coverage. No verifiable, reliable sourcing. No assertion of notability. Not meeting WP:N or WP:CORP or WP:GROUP Cheers,    Dloh  cierekim  20:10, 12 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi, I'm working on this article, and realize I need to add more external references validating the Theatre Company. Would a column from an FSU newspaper on the founding of our theatre, our inclusion in the Chicago Theatre Database, and other Chicago theatre show listings help?

User:abszeph
 * I'm talking about links to:
 * http://www.theatreinchicago.com/playdetail.php?playID=2505
 * http://chicagotheaterdb.com/companies/168
 * http://www.thedressingroomnews.com/2007/september/articles/theatre.html
 * https://securesite.chireader.com/cgi-bin/Archive/abridged2.bat?path=2007/070824/MSPLINT&search=tympanic
 * http://www.timeout.com/chicago/events/fringe-storefront/64025/589774/the-house-of-weird-death —Preceding unsigned comment added by Abszeph (talk • contribs) 21:14, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:40, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:41, 12 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Wizardman  19:14, 17 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete No coverage by reliable secondary sources, not notable IMO. RMHED (talk) 19:54, 22 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.