Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Type 79 mini rocket launcher


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. As no policy backed reasons for this article's retention have been made, the article's subject is found to lack notability. &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 15:33, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Type 79 mini rocket launcher

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable weapon; search in English turned up nothing and I'm not really sure what to search for Chinese. Created by a User:Ctway sock. ansh 666 08:31, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Firearms-related deletion discussions. ansh 666  08:31, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. ansh 666  08:31, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. ansh 666  08:31, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

DELETE...Dead end, one of a kind experimental weapons, with limited or no supporting references to establish notability do not meet guidelines.--RAF910 (talk) 17:20, 10 February 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  17:27, 17 February 2016 (UTC) Keep, or else Merge with Paramilitary forces of China, since it seems to have been specifically designed for the various militia forces and the like. Ceannlann gorm (talk) 21:21, 18 February 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete I looked at adding a mention of it to Type 69 RPG but it didn't fit and it's a very obscure weapon. --Mr. Magoo (talk) 18:17, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  17:27, 24 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.