Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Type 999 buoy tender


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  23:44, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Type 999 buoy tender

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Insignificant coverage. Source is a product listing of - I think - the cooking equipment manufacturer, which is unlikely to be the source of much of the article's content. Does not seem to appear in either Janes FIghting Ships 2015-2016 or 16 ed. of The Naval Institute Guide to Combat Fleets of the World. Googling does not turn up anything other than Wikipedia or republishers. Cursory search of the WP Library also does not bring up anything. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 05:18, 1 October 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:23, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military, Transportation,  and China. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 05:18, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Relisting comment: Already PROD'd, not eligible for Soft Deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:16, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete this might be one of my favorite AfDs in a long time. I was able to find some mentions of this boat online but there isn't a lot in english. If someone can find something in Chinese and help translate I would be willing to change my vote to keep but as it stands now it's not notable.  Dr vulpes  (💬 • 📝) 08:34, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete Clearly not notable, possibly an unattributed translation. The deprod rationale of "this is linked from a lot of articles" is garbage as all the links are from a single navbox. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 21:08, 15 October 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.