Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tyrone Rontganger


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sam Walton (talk) 12:58, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Tyrone Rontganger

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

There are many WP:PRIMARY sources in this article, but this person who won titles from 2012 to 2014 is not in the news.

No third party, reliable sources. Marvellous Spider -Man 17:12, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia (talk) 07:59, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia (talk) 07:59, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:30, 17 September 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Needs more input. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:54, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:PROMO; strictly advertising. The article exists to promoted the subject's accomplishments. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:41, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:54, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. As interested as some people may be in the leather subculture, holding a Mr. Leather title is not in and of itself a reason why a person gets permanent coverage in an encyclopedia. There are thousands of such pageants around the world, because almost every city that's large enough to have an organized LGBT community at all will have its own Mr. Leather pageant — and most winners don't get enough coverage to actually satisfy WP:GNG. And the sourcing here isn't showing that he's the exception to that rule, either — I'm seeing a lot of blogs and wikis and video streaming sites and primary sources, with literally just one reference in the entire bunch (Siegessäule, #3) that actually passes the reliable sourcing test. But one valid reference isn't enough to get a person into Wikipedia, if they don't have an automatic pass of any specific notability criterion and are depending solely on "media coverage exists, ergo GNG" as their includability argument. Bearcat (talk) 14:26, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete overly promotional article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:44, 27 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.