Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tzsch


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Latin-script pentagraphs.  bibliomaniac 1  5  03:47, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Tzsch

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Is it really a notable topic? Probably List_of_Latin-script_tetragraphs is enough. Wikisaurus (talk) 20:56, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:04, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:04, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Ping to article creator. – Uanfala (talk) 00:14, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Actually, I merged it back in 2012, but it was recreated. Can't say I care much one way or the other. — kwami (talk) 00:29, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Does it matter? The article contains a small, but encyclopedic, packet of information, and it won't really make much of a different whether it's kept separate or merged into a list. I kind of like the idea of this article: it's the only one we've got about a five-letter sequence, and its existence, notability or no notability, only adds to the delightful quirky pedantry for which Wikipedia is so renowned (and yes, because it's five letters long, if merged, it should go to the list of Latin-script pentagraphs). – Uanfala (talk) 00:10, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Indeed, and List_of_Latin-script_pentagraphs contains all the text of this article, except for the list of surnames. Wikisaurus (talk) 21:59, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect to the aptly identified List of Latin-script pentagraphs. If there is not more to say about this sequence than what is present in the article, then there's no reason for a standalone. Yes, it's already present in that list, with no less content than what is in that stub, excepting the examples (some of which could be added to the list entry). -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 20:25, 15 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.