Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/U-Freqs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 03:32, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

U-Freqs

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Article is for a non-notable music label. Label does not represent any notable bands that could pass WP:MUSIC also cannot pass WP:ORG. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда . 01:14, 22 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Because a music record label is usually a company or a division of a company, WP:ORG is the governing notability standard, and U-Freqs doesn't meet the standard: significant coverage in secondary sources. I can't find any independent sources discussing this label. NJ Wine (talk)
 * Delete in the present form, notability has not been demonstrated.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:24, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'm unable to find significant coverage for this label in reliable sources; does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:ORG.  Gongshow  Talk 08:19, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  Gongshow  Talk 08:28, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  Gongshow  Talk 08:28, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.