Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/U.F.O. (song)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. Procedural closure (non-admin closure) TB  randley  (review) 03:11, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

U.F.O. (song)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

1 line lead, 2 line recording section, and a quote for critical reception. There's no point in this article existing, there's not more than 5 sentences and only 5 sources. — AARON  &bull; TALK   22:32, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Procedural Keep The nominator has failed to put forward any policy-based argument for deletion.  Cullen 328  Let's discuss it  23:03, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep Song has charted. RazorEye ⡭ ₪ ·o' ⍦ ࿂ 00:31, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:40, 8 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Procedural Keep per Cullen.  Automatic  Strikeout   ( T  •  C ) 03:05, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.