Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/U.P. Naming Mahal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nomination withdrawn. I'm doing a bit of IAR and closing this per WP:NOTBUREAUCRACY. Should the bold redirect be undone, we can come back to AfD again. (non-admin closure) Lemongirl942 (talk) 16:27, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

U.P. Naming Mahal

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A university anthem without any independent notability. KDS4444 (talk) 02:59, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 13:02, 30 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Let me reiterate that: this is an article about a university's hymn. I could find no evidence of discussion of this subject in any reliable independent secondary sources, only lots of evidence published by the university itself— which makes those publications self-serving and unsuitable for establishing a case for real-world notability (WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES has no provisions for handling school hymns).  I welcome anyone who can demonstrate otherwise, but unless that happens, I nominate the existing article for deletion.  KDS4444 (talk) 12:16, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment Redirect to University of the Philippines Clearly not independently notable. I would say a redirect suffices here as the term is a valid search term. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 17:38, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 17:39, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  18:54, 6 September 2016 (UTC) ❌ I will convert this into a redirect myself. KDS4444 (talk) 11:52, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
 * I've removed my bolded redirect vote as there is no other !vote other than mine. I don't see a need for bureaucracy so I'm closing this as nomination withdrawn. I guess you can boldly redirect and if it is undone, we can come back to AfD. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 16:22, 11 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.