Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/U.R. Bronco


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to California State Polytechnic University, Pomona.  MBisanz  talk 19:40, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

U.R. Bronco

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )


 * Delete because this is not at all notable and is solely being used for promotion MUMMYMAN (talk) 04:36, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2012 December 6.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  05:00, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, there isn't anything notable about this program except for its connection with the university, but that doesn't appear to be sufficient justification to keep the article. Tiggerjay (talk) 05:56, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete This is the sort of detail that belongs on the school's web site. I see no purpose in making a redirect from this term, which is simply their private bureaucratic umbrella term that nobody outside the college would ever think of searching for. Whether any of the individual programs are notable, or even suitable for redirects, is another matter. Three currently have articles: I nominated 1 for deletion.  DGG ( talk ) 18:24, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence that this internal institutional programme has any notability. AllyD (talk) 19:24, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge to California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, which is the more appropriate place for this subject. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 22:23, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable and promotional. --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 02:08, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:43, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.