Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/U.S. 41st Field Artillery Brigade

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was keep. Joyous 20:19, Feb 26, 2005 (UTC)

U.S. 41st Field Artillery Brigade
Probable vanity. Notability of this particular brigade not established. Main focus is on commander's name and external URL. Radiant! 12:26, Feb 16, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep I added more info. Brigades are notable, if only for their size. Kevin Rector 14:40, Feb 16, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Whether it's notable or not there is little of value in this article. Trilobite (Talk) 15:12, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: Having little of value makes it a stub not a candidate for deletion. Kevin Rector 15:17, Feb 16, 2005 (UTC)
 * On second thoughts I think you are right on this one. Keep. &mdash; Trilobite (Talk) 15:52, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Brigades are large and finite in number. "provides divisonal artillery support for the 1st Armored Division" is/was an adequately valuable fact. Kappa 15:15, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Well done Kevin Rector. Capitalistroadster 15:54, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * All military units are notable. Keep.  RickK 00:08, Feb 17, 2005 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure that I agree that all units are notable but brigades probably are. Below brigade level, they'd have to be an independent command or have an exceptional history.  Keep.  Rossami (talk) 00:32, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep &mdash; Many brigades/regiments are very worthy topics. RJH 19:11, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.