Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/U.S. Jones


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Fox Feature Syndicate. History is available if anyone believes there is content that should be merged. RL0919 (talk) 22:03, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

U.S. Jones

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I've prodded this last yaer with "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (fiction) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar.". While it has been improved, I am afraid this hasn't been sufficient - the article is still just a publication history and plot summary, with zero evidence of significance (no reception, analysis, etc.). The only evidence of wider context is a sentence in the lead that describes the phenomane of WWII-era US patriotic superheroes (a likely notable topic), but that doesn't mean all such superheroes are notable. Some certainly are, but this one I am afraid does not. I recommend SOFTDELETE and redirecting to Fox_Feature_Syndicate, maybe a small merge too. But unless we can find a reception of this that meets WP:SIGCOV and goes beyond one-two sentences of plot summary (as in the sources cited), I am afraid there is no compelling reason to keep this as a stand-alone entry (interestingly, it seems there is more coverage of its collectibe pinback button than of the chracter itself...). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 08:55, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Science fiction and fantasy, Comics and animation,  and United States of America. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  08:55, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
 * In this case, I support the OP's suggestion that it be redirected to Fox_Feature_Syndicate, while the sourced content should be merged into the appropriate page. Perhaps something about the collective pinback button can be put on the appropriate page as well. --Historyday01 (talk) 12:58, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Goldsztajn (talk) 07:54, 19 May 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:14, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Listify I agree that this meets V but is arguably NN, and might be best represented in a list article. Jclemens (talk) 00:19, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Redirect - to Fox Feature Syndicate. Any pertinent cited material could be added there, and at this point there's no need for a separate list article.  Onel 5969  TT me 15:58, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete and/or redirect per User:onel5969. Article doesn't have sources to pass the WP:GNG. Shooterwalker (talk) 14:08, 2 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.