Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/U.S. Route 3 Bridge over the Connecticut River


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. As mentioned, the current title isn't suitable for a redirect. But, if anybody wants to create a redirect with a more concise title, go ahead.

I did take the liberty of adding the image to List of crossings of the Connecticut River -- RoySmith (talk) 01:09, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

U.S. Route 3 Bridge over the Connecticut River

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No References, I just looked all around, and I couldn't find anything but mirror sites for this article.--JJBers (talk) 11:01, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2016 September 27.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 11:05, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Hampshire-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 12:04, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:01, 28 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. Very ordinary, small concrete bridge built in the 1960s. No notability. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:11, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:17, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:17, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: As the nominator had closed this AFD I'm not entirely sure if it would go unknown so am relisting - I have no objections to any admin or Non-Admin closing this under any outcome, Thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 23:14, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment(humor alert!) "... built in the 1960s. No notability.", not that there is anything inherently non-notable about something being built in the 1960s ... Coolabahapple (talk) 15:23, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as not notable. Or Move to a more concise title and redirect to List of crossings of the Connecticut River. MB 22:21, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Close, I think it's been decided that this is just a redirect. I'll wait for another 12 hours (12:00, 10-1-16, UTC), but if nothing happens, I close this, move the page, and redirect it.&mdash; JJBers (talk) 00:20, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 23:14, 3 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Redirect. In my opinion it is obviously better to redirect the article than to delete it, probably to List of crossings of the Connecticut River.  No reason to antagonize the contributors to the article, and they weren't really obviously wrong to create the article.  I see that JJBers was concluding Redirect is the correct outcome already. -- do  ncr  am  06:33, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
 * What's the point of redirecting? Who on earth is ever going to search for or link to that cumbersome and artificial title? -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:41, 5 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.