Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/U.S. assistance defend Taiwan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. (sorry that I didn't see this discussion sooner). Liz Read! Talk! 06:27, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

U.S. assistance defend Taiwan

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Should this be moved to draft space? Not nearly ready for prime time in the mainspace. Amigao (talk) 02:28, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Userfy as quickly as possible. The article reads somewhat like an essay, is not appropriately sourced, and requires scrutiny before publishing to main. As a patroller, I'd have draftified this, rather than marking as reviewed. Due to the nature of this topic, it really required close attention for verification of claims and statements made. This needs a speedy draft... — MaxnaCarta  ( 💬 • 📝 ) 03:37, 4 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Comment - Look carefully at this - looks like a copy and paste from somewhere else. The title is not good English, but a poor copy of the first sentence. No real sources provided. The little numbers that would normally be links to the source, are nothing but numbers in brackets - they go nowhere. This doesn't look right. — Maile  (talk) 03:40, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations, Military, China, Taiwan,  and United States of America.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  04:28, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment Wikied article, pinging the prof: Jumpytoo Talk 04:56, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Speedy draftify: Not enough sources. This could've just been draftified at an individual editor's discretion imo. Queen   of   Hearts ❤️  (no relation) 05:00, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Speedy draftify or move back to user sandbox. Apologies (I am the supervising instructor), this was published before I gave the student permission to move this out of sandbox. It is obviously not finished yet. --Piotrus at Hanyang&#124; reply here 05:29, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:TNT. It's a hodge-podge of stuff that looks AI-generated or cut and pasted from somewhere. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:25, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Draft or TNT bizarre title, mostly unsourced, improperly formatted. Notable topic though. JM (talk) 07:50, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete – it's in no small part just copy and pastes of other Wikipedia pages, though I've come here from the AI cleanup project, and that appears to be an issue in parts. More importantly, If you look closely, it's actually just pro mainland Chinese propaganda. That's evidenced by both the tenor of the article's reference list, and, the inclusion of disconnected headline-style phrases throughout the article such as "The United States regards Taiwan as a pawn that can be traded and sacrificed." Jondvdsn1 (talk) 12:21, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Draftify - title stutters, (how about U.S. defense of Taiwan ??) and it also needs some serious copyrighting.  Atsme 💬 📧 14:57, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: Clunky title, and it basically rehashes the "Sino-American Mutual Defense Treaty" article, I don't see the need for this. Language is weird throughout as well. Oaktree b (talk) 15:31, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Draftify or Move back to user sandbox. Per 's comment above. This is a student that moved their assignment into mainspace too early by accident. They need somewhere to keep working on it. – Novem Linguae (talk) 17:45, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Draftify as an WP:ATD. I am sure that there are sources for this and even one day be considered its own article if Taiwan were ever invaded. Conyo14 (talk) 18:15, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Draftify considering this is supposedly part of a school project. Regardless of how it's written (which is honestly bad) I'm not fond of the idea of having the student start from scratch all over again. S5A-0043 Talk 14:30, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Draftify or move to user sandbox so page creator can continue working on it, not ready for mainspace. Alextejthompson (Ping me or leave a message on my talk page) 22:49, 7 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.