Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/U/G Madness


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  Sango 123  00:47, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

U/G Madness
One Magic: the Gathering deck type, out of hundreds. Article reads like a play guide rather than an encyclopedia article. We already have an article that gives an overview of deck types. I am a longtime Magic player (even played with this deck type!) and I still don't think this is notable enough for its own article.Andrew Levine 13:53, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Akradecki 13:57, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as nominator. Andrew Levine 14:05, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Kafziel 14:19, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Wikipedia is not a strategy guide for games. Scorpiondollprincess 14:36, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. If anything it belongs a list of types. - Penwhale | Blast the Penwhale 15:54, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- Grev 17:35, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Good deck, doesn't belong on Wikipedia, which isn't a game guide. --Core des at talk. ^_^ 00:28, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Game articles should stick to description, not prescription. Zetawoof(&zeta;) 01:52, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.