Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/U1DB


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ with no prejudice against speedy renomination. — Red-tailed hawk  (nest) 00:22, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

U1DB

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Doesn't appear to be notable. Pepper Beast   (talk)  16:47, 30 December 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 22:20, 6 January 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:35, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.   Pepper Beast    (talk)  16:47, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. Quick google search revealed at least two reliable and independent sources with significant coverage: this and this. And it's not developed by some random developers, it's from Canonical. I'm not saying that it should inherit notability from the company, but I think that the sources I provided here allow the subject to meet WP:NSOFT.  Delta  space 42 (talk • contribs) 18:40, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.