Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UBC International Law Journal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. No argument or evidence advanced that the article meets WP:GNG or WP:NJOURNALS j⚛e deckertalk 20:18, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

UBC International Law Journal

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Declined Prod. Prod reason was "Unproved notability as per WP:NJournals guidelines. No cited statements. No demonstration of impact. Significant potential conflict of interest of author of article being one of the founding students.". Prod Decliner's reasoning was "IMHO should be merged and redirected to University of British Columbia". Subsequent edits have removed a significant amount of the previous puff content. Still fails NJournal. Hasteur (talk) 17:04, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete At this point, this even fails WP:V, as the journal's homepage is down. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NJournals. --Guillaume2303 (talk) 20:09, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:15, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:15, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bibliographies-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:21, 19 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Per nom and delete vote above. Can't find anything in the Journals secondary guidelines which allows this through. Doesn't meet that or any general standard. Lord Roem (talk) 20:54, 19 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:GNG at the most basic level: there are no sources at all (I searched but found nothing). IRWolfie- (talk) 09:43, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete This journal does not appear to meet any of the criteria for WP:NJournals. Also there doesn't seem to be any independent reliable sources that cover this publication and therefore it also fails WP:GNG. --- Steve Quinn (talk) 22:21, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - The journal doesn't seem to be notable and nor is sourced, this fails WP:GNG.  →TSU tp* 14:50, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.