Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UDF 366


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 02:35, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

UDF 366

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No apparent significance. I cannot find a published paper that discusses this object in any sort of detail. Isambard Kingdom (talk) 20:24, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. North America1000 10:29, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 08:16, 11 January 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 14:08, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. No assertion of notability. All the published info on this object could fit on one row of a spreadsheet.Glendoremus (talk) 04:01, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails all criteria of WP:NASTRO. Astro4686 (talk) 00:08, 21 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.