Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UDF 3822


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Xymmax So let it be written   So let it be done  01:26, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

UDF 3822

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No apparent significance, other than being an object on a long list of galaxies that can be seen in the Hubble telescope. I can't find a published paper that is specifically on this object. Isambard Kingdom (talk) 14:31, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:34, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Weak keep – this is entirely subjective, but I believe being "the brightest galaxy in the lower left quadrant of the Hubble Ultra Deep Field" is significant enough to warrant its own stub article (WP:NOTPAPER), especially because of how famous the Deep Field is. Laurdecl talk 02:50, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per nom. Regarding the 'weak keep' vote, the relevant issue is whether it satisfies the criteria established by the community in WP:NASTRO. It fails all four prongs of that policy. It (1) is not visible to the unaided eye and has never been so, (2) is not in a catalogue of interest to amateur astronomers or a catalogue of historical interest, (3) has not been the subject of in-depth attention in reliable secondary sources, and (4) was discovered after 1850. Astro4686 (talk) 07:30, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — MRD2014 (talk • contribs) 21:53, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per Astro4686 explanation. Since this does not meet our inclusion guidelines for astronomy, it should not be kept. TonyBallioni (talk) 22:49, 21 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.