Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UDP Torrent Protocol


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus.  MBisanz  talk 03:40, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

UDP Torrent Protocol

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Breaks the policy of WP:CRYSTAL. It features the product of an upcoming product. Gopal81 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:42, 23 Decemb not {{er 2008 (UTC) 
 * Redirect to μTorrent; if I understand rightly, this describes the way that μTorrent (clearly a notable product) works, so it seems that UDP T P is somewhat reasonable as a target. Nyttend (talk) 14:49, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - The article is not about a product; its about a technology (protocol) that already exists. Mentioning that uTorrent is planning to incorporate it in their product is not a violation of Crystal, as long as its verifiable.--Unpopular Opinion (talk) 14:53, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as nn technical minutia or Merge to BitTorrent (protocol), where it could live happily next to all the other details about the various ways BitTorrent works. gnfnrf (talk) 00:09, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  {{sup| talk }} 00:33, 27 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep - It's about a technology, not a product. The technology is notable, and the article simply mentions how it will be used in uTorrent in the next version.  2  D C  00:37, 27 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep or Redirect and Merge into BitTorrent (protocol) - I am joining the chorus, but it needs to happen: this is not WP:CRYSTAL as the protocol exists. Also, not about product. Please pay more attention before jumping the gun. However, this might not be enough info for a single article, so a redirect and merge might be a solution. Thanks!--Cerejota (talk) 00:45, 27 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep - This technology soon to be in use, and will grow to be much more so in the near future. Certainly notable and certainly not WP:CRYSTAL.  Cheers,  Jake Wartenberg {{sup| Talk }} 07:08, 27 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep or possibly merge with User Datagram Protocol or BitTorrent (protocol).  Linguist At Large  10:27, 27 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep or maybe merge with BitTorrent (protocol). It's a cool new technology, I don't really care about the BitTorrent company angle, I want to know about, how does it work etc. Sbwoodside (talk) 23:24, 27 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.