Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UEFA Cup 2006-07 knockout stage


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. For the benefit of those discussing subpages and referencing a help page on meta, please read WP:SUBPAGE. JERRY talk contribs 05:02, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

UEFA Cup 2006-07 knockout stage

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Totally not notable. There is no need to go into such detail about every matches of the competition. The competition could not stand for anything. Raymond Giggs 17:15, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge to UEFA Cup 2006-07 --Daddy.twins (talk) 17:46, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - This article goes into much more detail than the main article. If the two articles were to be merged, the main article would become much too big. – PeeJay 18:38, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - Length of article doesn't justify a separate root entry for one stage, in my opinion. I think creating a subpage, if possible, would be reasonable under UEFA Cup 2006-07/Knockout Stage --Daddy.twins (talk) 18:50, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - Well, the subpage is applied on the user pages, wikipedia pages... but not article pages. Raymond Giggs 18:55, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - That's entirely unfortunate. I guess I would stick with the original Merge opinion, then. I think it makes more sense to keep subcomponents with their parent. --Daddy.twins (talk) 19:44, 9 February 2008 (UTC)  Found this about subpages Help:Link and maybe it could apply. --Daddy.twins (talk) 19:49, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - Contradiction. First Round is counted into the proper round - again. If you not need the first round article means that proper rounds' article - detailed result - are not needed to be detailed. Raymond Giggs 18:55, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I can't understand a bloody thing you're saying. Where does it say on UEFA.com that the First Round is a "proper round", and what does that have to do with it being notable? – PeeJay 18:58, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Reply - Sorry... communication fault. My fault. Sorry. (According to Deryck Chan, my communication skills is very low-ranked - regardless in English or Chinese. LOL) I was meant that the scores in the first round would be counted into the scorer table. That means first round is compulsory for every teams - including the reigning champions, if Sevilla FC have not to be participate in the CL group stage. Raymond Giggs 19:23, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep This article probably shouldn't have been created before the games started, but now it's here I don't see any reason to delete. There will be extensive coverage of these games so WP:N will be satisfied. Given that individual American wresting matches are deemed notable (wrongly, IMO), a round of a popular soccer competition seems to pass WP:N with flying colours. --Nick Dowling (talk) 22:33, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep The only real question is whether there should be more detail.DGG (talk) 00:32, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Again nothing wrong with this article, it contains all notable information, the article shouldn't be merged. That would make the main article much too big. Fine the way it is. Govvy (talk) 12:26, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per 07-08 entry. Peanut4 (talk) 00:28, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge The urge to make detailed articles about every tiny detail of every ball that has been kicked in the last couple of years is pure recentism, and wikipedia is not an almanac of what's happening in the football news. Enough is enough. One article for the season's UEFA cup competition should suffice. Robotforaday (talk) 12:30, 15 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.