Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UEI College


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:50, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

UEI College

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable trade school; not a degree granting institution; could not find any sources to establish notability. MelanieN (talk) 00:25, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  —• Gene93k (talk) 18:36, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:36, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. Google News Archives does turn up several dozen references under the institution's prior name, United Education Institute. Note for example .  For the moment, I'm reserving my opinion on whether these are enough to show notability.--Arxiloxos (talk) 21:28, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, it's a start. There's a story at Fox Business news about them changing their name, and a couple of passing mentions in the LA Times. The item in Forbes turns out to be a press release, though. Still, more of this kind of thing might establish notability. --MelanieN (talk) 03:47, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep - We generally consider high schools to be inherently notable. In my opinion, given this policy, any accredited institution which grants Associates degrees, as this college apparently is and does, should clearly be considered notable as well. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Minnowtaur (talk • contribs) 19:23, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.