Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UEnd Foundation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 20:43, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

UEnd Foundation

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable local organization with penny-ante budget; article has a history of COI involvement, but I realize that is not itself grounds for deletion unless it was a blatant G11. Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  02:05, 12 February 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 01:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep. I added this reference: http://www.metronews.ca/calgary/local/article/389924--passing-on-holiday-gifts  Eastmain (talk • contribs)  01:42, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi, Eastman. Sadly, that kind of passing mention doesn't really provide material from which we can write sourced encyclopedia articles.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  — Eastmain (talk • contribs)  01:45, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  — Eastmain (talk • contribs)  01:45, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Wine Guy  ~Talk  02:10, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete notabilty not asserted, lacks significant coverage in 3rd party sources RadioFan (talk) 10:54, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete per WP:ORG, and it looks like there have been long-running WP:COI/WP:SPAM problems here. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  04:03, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this organization. Joe Chill (talk) 00:53, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: The article Eastman mentions is a wonderful story but doesn't really tell us anything about UEnd we can use to write an entry. I can't find significant (secondary, independent, reliable, notable) coverage either.  --Joe Decker (talk) 05:55, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.