Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UFC 111


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete - original article was clear vandalism. Glen 18:36, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

UFC 111

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Pure unencyclopedic opinion and nonsense. No factual value. Friginator (talk) 01:51, 18 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Forgive me if you already knew this, but the current content is not what it should be. This is what it was before someone changed the whole article. -99.255.188.158 (talk) 01:54, 18 October 2009 (UTC)


 * My mistake. Sorry. Friginator (talk) 02:17, 18 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete for the time being. There are already six future UFCs listed which is quite enough. &mdash; RHaworth 02:33, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. I agree with RHaworth's thinking here.  While the original AfD was based on a vandalized version of the article, the current version really says nothing because there is no solid information about this future event.  It should be deleted with no prejudice against recreation if verifiable information becomes available. ---  RepublicanJacobite  The'FortyFive'  03:21, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails Wikipedia's nobility guidelines.   Btilm  03:52, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable. There's an edit war over very little content. Let them take the battle elsewhere and recreate the article after the fight is over. --UncleDouggie (talk) 04:51, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: too early for this one. Maybe wait for a few months for sources to come out? Alexius08 (talk) 12:31, 18 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete: Too early to mention this event on the site. The event will obviously happen eventually, and it probably won't be too long until Dana White or someone in the UFC comments on the possible date & location for this event. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Joe8609 (talk • contribs) 17:35, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Maybe bring it back when we have something to confirm, like a date or a city. --JY23 (talk) 22:46, 19 October 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.