Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UFIDA


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was KEEP. Mo0 [ talk ] 16:23, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

UFIDA
Not notable. Sleepyhead 11:58, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep possible bad-faith nom by author of recently deleted article on a minor competitor, . Article states "#1 ERP vendor in the Asia-Pacific area, with over 400,000 implementions as of 2005" - that would make it notable beyond question.  Whether that is verifiable is another matter; since this has not been challenged (including by noiminator) I'm inclined to accept it at face value. JzG 12:20, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. Crypticbot 17:45, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per JzG. Need a better nomination than that.  &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-13 23:20Z 
 * Keep per above. -- JJay 03:02, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per JzG -- Astrokey44 |talk 03:54, 14 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.