Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UFO sightings in Germany


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete DES (talk) 19:03, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

UFO sightings in Germany

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

The only information of the article, which calls itself a list, is a forwarding to another article, Haselbach encounter. Within four months nothing else was added. Therefore further changes are not to be expected. Thw1309 14:03, 24 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep - i see nothing wrong with this article, it just helps place a central spot to list redirects to articles on Germany UFO sightings (note: i created this article) (:O) -Nima Baghaei talk · cont · email 16:49, 24 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete Unless more information is found. Or else just redirect to that one encounter.-- - =Elfin= - 341 17:55, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to the single article for now. The list can be resurrected when more articles are created, or more relevant info comes up that's not enough for a separate article. By the way, would Nazi UFOs fit in here? Totnesmartin 20:23, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. This doesn't qualify as either an article or a list.  Someguy1221 21:22, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Not sourced and barely any content. Nick mallory 01:18, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, hmmm, quite useless and seems to only exist to point to another article; the article's reference section seals the deal! (Also, many of the articles at List of UFO sightings are pretty similar to this one...)  *Cremepuff 222*  " As cool as grapes... "  01:45, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete in agreement with the above deletes. This article isn't really needed. Acalamari 21:12, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 'Keep: This is a stub at present, expand, don't delete. - perfectblue 15:11, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep and tag as a stub. --Kralizec! (talk) 19:08, 30 May 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.