Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UFXMarkets


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 05:10, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

UFXMarkets

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The creating editor has removed the PROD, thus I have brought it here as a contested PROD. Reason was "This corporation has had a remarkably similar article speedily deleted once as failing WP:GNG. The references are Press Release material or primary sources, and there is no obvious reason that the organisation is at all notable. It appears to be a run of the mill brokerage with nothing to justify an article here. The username of the creating editor also implies some sort of COI and thus trade puffery. I see this as WP:VANISPAMCRUFTISEMENT" Fiddle   Faddle  14:28, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cyprus-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 18:30, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 18:30, 3 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete No evidence found of notability; fails WP:CORPDEPTH. (That aside, the contributing editor's comment "This page officially describes the company" appears to indicate WP:COI.) AllyD (talk) 21:10, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.