Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UKNova


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was no consensus.  Sango 123  17:55, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

UKNova
There's no indication that this website meets any of the criteria of WP:WEB. In particular, there are no links (as are required) showing that it is "the subject of multiple non-trivial published works", and none are readily apparent from Google. Wikipedia is not a directory of websites. Sandstein 08:47, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:WEB. It's just a torrent site. An April Fool's hoax doesn't make it notable, either. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 08:52, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep, impressive Alexa rank of 7,483. —Quarl (talk) 2006-07-02 09:29Z 
 * Keep "UKNova" gets 45,500 Google hits, which is a big number, and of those hits, 721 are unique, and that's a big number. The site boasts a ton of registered members. Its Alexa rank is incredibly impressive- not just overall, but especially considering the site is British. -- Kicking222 11:48, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Just an advert, not notable IMHO Brian 12:53, 2 July 2006 (UTC)btball
 * Delete per nom. Just a torrent site. --DarkAudit 12:55, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete for failing WP:WEB, only 78 sites link to the URL (from google). --WinHunter (talk) 14:43, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete just another torrent site. Zzzzz 17:32, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. one of few torrent sites providing exclusive British content. --Madchester 05:07, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep high Alexa count demonstrates notability. Royalbroil 05:00, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as above --Howard Train 06:22, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * Keep as above --Howard Train 06:22, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.