Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UK ALCo group


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. None of this content is verified, so it should not be merged. ÷seresin 07:02, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

UK ALCo group

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Speedy declined for unknown reason - Local railway history group restoring an old locomotive. Has a website and a yahoo group. While the subject matter is intersting I don't see this anywhere near passing WP:CLUB Passportguy (talk) 20:52, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  21:06, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Reduce to stub and merge to American Locomotive Company ALCO S-1 and S-3. Fences and windows (talk) 21:38, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Keep, this group is restoring 1 of assisting with the restoration of the surviving 3 examples of only a handful of US built ALCo locomotives ever exported to the UK. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 22:46, 5 June 2009 (UTC) (edited, corrected number of locomotives, and groups role) Wuhwuzdat (talk) 23:02, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:35, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - I can't find any sources covering this at all. If some sources providing verifiability can be produced, I would suggest a merge to ALCO S-1 and S-3 as a more direct target than the previously suggested American Locomotive Company as the article indicates the restoration is for a specific type of locomotive. -- Whpq (talk) 17:47, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Comment, Upon further consideration, I would not object to merging the content to ALCO S-1 and S-3. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 01:09, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.