Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UK funky


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep  as another bad-faith nomination by a sock puppet of User:Yaneleksklus. Non-admin closure. MuZemike ( talk ) 00:52, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

UK funky

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable genre of music, insufficient content, should be merged to funky house at its best. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Man with a huge cock (talk • contribs) December 30, 2008


 * Weak Keep. A distinct genre that has received some coverage.,, . --Michig (talk) 07:14, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. A clearly sonically and culturally distinct genre from funky house. It's in its nascent stage and seems to becoming all that is played on UK pirate radio which is the medium that spawned uk garage grime and dubstep.  Obviously needs a thorough rewrite though.  Claphands (talk)  —Preceding undated comment was added at 09:16, 30 December 2008 (UTC).


 * Keep Some sources given at the bottom of the page seem to be major UK newspapers and magazines. Although others are blogs, this genre has established notability outside of Wikipedia. R . T . 13:29, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Sources establish notabilty. Artw (talk) 20:02, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 22:35, 30 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.