Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UMAUD


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. as WP:CSD. Please open a new AfD for the other article (possibly referring to this AfD). – sgeureka t•c 22:39, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

UMAUD

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Taking this out of the db-spam speedy deletion queue since it involves a school program. Obviously, schools can be as self-promotional as any company and some school projects should be deleted as spam; other school projects should be merged, and others have independent notability. I believe there's consensus for 5-day discussion instead of speedy deletion for education projects (with exceptions for obvious spamming), but I'd appreciate feedback if I'm wrong. - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 16:28, 15 March 2009 (UTC) tweaked 17:05, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Spammy, questionable notability. Lets  drink  Tea  16:40, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  —TerriersFan (talk) 17:17, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete  Single academic one year masters program at a single university. These are never encyclopedic. DGG (talk) 17:51, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Thanks guys. The tagger (MuffledThud) just brought UMAUD Environment and Natural Resources studies to my attention, which is more or less a copy, except the creator has done some work on the second one.  Are there any objections to speedily deleting UMAUD and AfD'ing the second article? - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 18:43, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Makes sense to me. MuffledThud (talk) 18:47, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
 * and to me./ DGG (talk) 22:07, 15 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.