Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UMW Toyota Motor (Malaysia)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). Note that the nominator withdrew in a comment in the discussion. North America1000 22:38, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

UMW Toyota Motor (Malaysia)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The main issue with this article is that there is nothing encyclopedic about this article for it to be worth keeping aside its wholly unsourced plus most distributors do not have Wikipedia articles unless they are involved in production or have other things that meet notability guidelines which this one don't. Does not in any shape or form meet WP:GNG. Donnie Park (talk) 09:26, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra (talk) 10:41, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra (talk) 10:41, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:41, 9 November 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 03:33, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
 * comment Distributing automobiles in a country is in no way a factor for meriting an encyclopedia article. "spammy" is also not enough to delete an article. In what way does it meet requirements for deletion Nom? CerealKillerYum (talk) 05:10, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
 * For a start, what and where does it assert notability? Why and how is it notable? This article fails on all counts aside being an official importer. Even Nintendo of America like this nominated company, get a lot of press yet is a redirect to Nintendo. A majority of subsidiaries of car manufacturers such as Honda of America and Nissan Motor Manufacturing UK have articles as they are involved in domestic production which this one does not. Donnie Park (talk) 15:17, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Good to see that you took the points into consideration and edited the nomination. Now, lets stay on topic. CerealKillerYum (talk) 16:05, 21 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete fails GNG CerealKillerYum (talk) 16:05, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep ; Hi all, I have revamped the page as best I could in the last 6 hours. Please do reconsider the current state of the page, I hope it's sufficient to save it from deletion. If not, please let me know, I will try to improve it further. Best regards, Aero777 (talk) 01:12, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
 * It's a lot better than it was when it was nominated, the only issue it has is that none of the pages (for the linked cars) make references to it. As it seems, I will accept it as it is, so consider the nomination withdrawn. Donnie Park (talk) 01:31, 25 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.