Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UNC Charlotte Books


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 16:04, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

UNC Charlotte Books

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Merely an indiscriminate list of books by a publisher that fails WP:CORP and WP:ORG (whichever applicable). Contested prod. MER-C 07:53, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom (indescriminate list). Perhaps categorize as well. Part Deux 10:00, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete unless this can be turned into an actual article. i.e. establish notability, historical context, important publications, etc. --Tainter 15:48, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. This article does not claim to be a list of books published by the university or its press, but a list of books by faculty, staff, students, or alumni of the university. And not all the entries even appear to be books; some seem to be articles or contributions to conference proceedings. This could easily become, and probably already is, an indiscriminate list. --Metropolitan90 20:40, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * delete. We do not and should not have articles of this sort for universities. (& if we actually do have some, its time to remove them) They are much too encompassing, . We have many articles for notable scholars at the universities, which mention their books. . We have individual articles for the very most  notable among their books. We have categories to group these articles. We don't need this. Imagine what such a list would look like for Oxford or Harvard or Berkeley. DGG 00:28, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
 * delete as per nom. Kathy A. 01:50, 4 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.