Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UNKNOWN


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was speedy delete as a WP:CSD A7 - person with no claim of notability. - A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 00:44, 19 October 2005 (UTC)

UNKNOWN
MMORPG characters are inherently non-notable. Delete. &mdash; J I P | Talk 12:12, 13 October 2005 (UTC)


 * well, I'd like to think that he is, considering there are over 17,000 players world-wide who play the game. This user in particular is ranked between 1 and 3, making him notable to the Stargate-nerd community! keep!Hunterd 12:27, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Vanity article. --GraemeL (talk) 12:50, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete obvious vanity, NN subject. Note to Hunterd above: 17,000 is not a lot for a game.  Numerous MMORPGs have hundreds of thousands of players. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd  13:15, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Nope, he's still non-notable... and since he's between 1 and 3, does that make him #2? Delete fancruft.--Isotope23 14:00, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable player of a non-notable game. - A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 15:15, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. I created this article!!! oh and you know what I meant by between 1 and 3... and thank you Starblind for that note... User: A Man In Black: Stargate Wars is a huge game in the stargate franchise. it is like the equivalent of the Star Wars novels... --ZPMMaker 15:24, 13 October 2005 (UTC)]]
 * Please vote only once. And it's the equivalent of Star Wars fanfic; it's an unauthorized, fan-made MUD based on a popular SF property. - A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 15:30, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
 * keep. btw i realised i could change my nickname to zpmmaker... (but i am actually hunterd) -- ZPMMaker 15:26, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, and please stop voting multiple times; they will not count in your favor and serve only to irritate the closing admin (you're free to continue to reply, just leave out the vote) &mdash; Lomn | Talk / RfC 15:33, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete and get a life :) Renata3 15:37, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Says the person taking part in a vote to see if it should remain in an encyclopedia. :) the wub  "?!"  22:49, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete until we get the developers to extend mediawiki to automatically detect and reject all articles about people's videogame alter-egos. heh. CDC   (talk)  19:34, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per CDC. Anyone fancy filing a request at bugzilla? the wub  "?!"  22:49, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Could've been speedied, per no claim of notability. Ambi 03:23, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete game-cruft vanity. 64.4.104.2 16:23, 14 October 2005 (UTC)

Fine. you can delete this on the fact that the character is not notable, but you will not be able to delete the Stargate Wars article; for subjects that are not people do not have to be notable according to the rules! ZPMMaker 11:53, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.