Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UNSW Atheist Society


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete -- JForget  00:06, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

UNSW Atheist Society

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

a non notable student organisation, failing WP:ORG. no real third party coverage. google search mainly shows mirror sites and directory listings. LibStar (talk) 01:31, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 01:47, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Atheism-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 01:47, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 01:47, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom. The University of New South Wales has 44,581 students; a student organization at that university that claims (by the article's own flattering light) one half of one percent of those students is not notable. The article cites nothing of consequence to establish notability, so should be deleted. - Simon Dodd { U·T·C·WP:LAW } 02:28, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and Simon Dodd. Pretty clear case. tedder (talk) 02:46, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Niteshift36 (talk) 02:56, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per ^^^. JBsupreme (talk) 06:37, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, a non-notable student society, no significant third-party coverage that I could find. Lankiveil (speak to me) 04:23, 28 June 2009 (UTC).


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.