Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UNaXcess (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

AfDs for this article: 

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 02:05, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

UNaXcess

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (companies) requirement. " It was deprodded since I missed the minor technicality of this being VfD a decade ago (Talk:UNaXcess/deletion). Well, I agree with the original VfDer, "Vanity page for a private website", or not much better. 13 years on, this piece of computer history is still not-notable (just full of OR like "today the system is known as UA2 to most people and is mainly haunted by current and ex students from the University of Manchester Computer Science department and members of its computer society, CompSoc"). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 20:17, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete unless some reliable sources can be found to demonstrate notability. Powers T 20:22, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Dialectric (talk) 15:42, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 03:07, 1 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.