Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UO Computer and Information Science Department


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to University of Oregon. Liz Read! Talk! 04:37, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

UO Computer and Information Science Department

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Not notable. Few outside sources. - Wiseoleman17 (talk) 01:26, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  02:44, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. --24.85.234.209 (talk) 05:19, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Schools. Shellwood (talk) 07:29, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete per nom. Handmeanotherbagofthemchips (talk) 16:08, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable. Few references of importance. --Wiseoleman17 (talk) 20:54, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
 * You've already voiced your opinion that the article should be deleted by nominating it; you don't need to say so again. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 21:04, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:44, 19 August 2022 (UTC) Relisting comment: Last relist Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:40, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Merge/redirect to main University of Oregon page Andre🚐 06:45, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Redirect to University of Oregon. I think there is a case to retain the article history here as some content may have scope for being merged, however I am unsure exactly which parts could be and there isn't an appropriate section on the proposed target article now to either merge into or directly redirect to. The majority of the references are primary sources and those that aren't I don't believe sufficiently assert notability. A straight redirect at least allows for future selective merging with attribution as I am not seeing a case for this to remain an article. Bungle (talk • contribs) 08:34, 26 August 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.