Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UPENDRA 2


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Upendra (non-admin closure) Red Phoenix  build the future...remember the past... 02:16, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

UPENDRA 2

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Film is not yet notable enough to have a stand alone article, was recently PRODed at Upendra 2 BOVINEBOY 2008 14:45, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:12, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:12, 18 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete per being TOO SOON. Bad form to simply capitalize the article name to get around the earlier speedy of a film article, but as the topic of the planned sequel "Upendra 2" is searchable and sourcable, I have just restored and then redirected the earlier earlier title to Upendra (film). We can allow undeletion/recreation once this sequel begins filming.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 17:26, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Oops It does seem as this sequel has begun filming last August. I will look into properly expanding the earlier version. This one can go.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 17:32, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:28, 26 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Upendra this subject on its own does not pass WP:GNG or WP:NFF, no credible references, the same person is the producer, actor and director of this movie that is in production and the first movie as well. but as a part of reference in Upendra this could be added as a line that a sequql is in the works, if this sequel gains notoriety on its own then a separate page in future can be started  --Nlfestival (talk) 20:46, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.