Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UPX (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Non-admin closure: withdrawing nomination. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 12:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC) AfDs for this article: 

UPX

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article has no independent secondary sources to corroborate its notability, and hasn't had any since it was written back. Kept after a 2005 AfD that featured mostly WP:ITSPOPULAR-style arguments. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 16:26, 22 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep. I've just added  two book sources found easily through a Google book search.  There are lots more out there.  We decide to keep an article based on whether sources exist, not whether they've been cited.  But as things now stand, they both exist AND they've been cited.  Did nom attempt to do a search for sources before making the nomination?  It doesn't appear so.  Msnicki (talk) 23:02, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Highly notable. Do a Google Book search on e.g. "UPX malware". —Ruud 11:49, 23 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.