Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/URDAD


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 18:42, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

URDAD

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable methodology. This methodology has been discussed by Fritz Solms in a paper published in "New trends in software methodologies, tools and techniques" but no other sources can be found in Google Scholar that mention this methodology. The article has been created by who claims to be the same person. The ACM paper referenced (ACM 2007) assesses 3 methods of which URDAD is described as a "novel" methodology but does not establish the notability of the method and the paper is actually about assessing methodologies but does refer to Solms Training Consulting and Development who created the methodology. No other papers are available that are independent of Solms. Ash (talk) 20:37, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. Already speedied once as spam. Hairhorn (talk) 02:01, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, obvious advertising for a product that makes no claim of minimal importance. And oh look! it's another article about a method for supervising computer programmers: analysis and design methodology for generating a technology neutral design in the context of model driven development. It is used by business analysts to perform technology neutral business process design and by software system designers for technology neutral software design. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:42, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Just got a talk page message from asking that the article not be deleted. I don't know why I got this message. Duffbeerforme (talk) 11:51, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I now see why I got the message, I tagged the previous version for speedy deletion (G11) last year. Duffbeerforme (talk) 11:56, 20 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete This version looks like spam to me. Duffbeerforme (talk) 11:59, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.