Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/URPS


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 13:54, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

URPS

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unreferenced, this article reads like either an opinion or advertising. Believe it fails GNG Gbawden (talk) 11:07, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete: this article flies in face of WP:NOTDICT, and I can't find usage examples to overcome WP:NEO. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 16:05, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:21, 30 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete&mdash;FURPS is a notable topic (although currently not well-served by its article). URPS is only used in relationship to the full FURPS (or FURPS+) model, e.g., "ease with which it can be split into functional (F) and non-functional (URPS) components".  Given this, I don't see where a redirect would be helpful.  Lesser Cartographies (talk) 07:03, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.