Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/USAF Heritage Flight


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. I'm concerned with the language used here in the Keep opinions ("seems to meet", "appears to pass") which shows a lack of precision and confidence about the sourcing in the article but it doesn't worry me enough to relist this discussion unless the nominator objects to this closure. This closure is also influenced by the fact that there wasn't strong support for Deletion. Liz Read! Talk! 21:54, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

USAF Heritage Flight

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Tagged for notability since 2010. No indication of notability. Fails WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:38, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and United States of America. UtherSRG (talk) 14:38, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. Lots of news coverage at https://www.google.com/search?tbm=nws&q=%22USAF+Heritage+Flight%22+-wikipedia&tbs=ar:1 Eastmain (talk • contribs) 15:13, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Is any of it WP:SIGCOV. "Lots" implies quantity, not quality. - UtherSRG (talk) 15:25, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:45, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
 * This was as far as I could take it. I feel like it merits a mention somewhere, however there's no mention of the flight in History of the United States Air Force and United_States_Air_Force only mentions the planes. Absent a target, I guess it's weak delete. Star   Mississippi  02:47, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. Appears to pass WP:GNG. -- Necrothesp (talk) 09:58, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep meets WP:GNG. Mztourist (talk) 05:15, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep, I agree that it seems to meet WP:GNG. Actualcpscmscrutinize, talk 17:05, 23 August 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.