Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/USA Publications


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. spa votes cary very littke weight and there appears to be no sourcing on which to hang a merge Spartaz Humbug! 03:33, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

USA Publications

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable student publication. Google hits is 8 including Wikipedia results. Revision before I removed some non-notable sections (I thought it was notable then) Moray An Par (talk) 09:30, 13 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Moray An Par (talk) 09:31, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Moray An Par (talk) 09:31, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. The article fails to meet the guidelines of WP:GNG. There is already some discussion of the corps in the article for the paper they publish, and other than that paper, they do not seem to do much that is anything close to noteworthy. Inks.LWC (talk) 09:57, 13 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. A student newspaper. I remember them well, universally non notable. Szzuk (talk) 16:55, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to University of San Agustin. No notability independent of the university, but potentially a worthwhile element of the university article. --Orlady (talk) 20:43, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Don't Delete. I would like to defend our school publication's page. We are still compiling the whole article. As to our references, we are doing our best to look for valid references. Our alumni has reached different parts of the world; but since the USA Publications page in Wikipedia is new, of course we still have a low number of hits. Thank you for understanding. Adrian attacks. 14 May 2011 —Preceding undated comment added 01:47, 14 May 2011 (UTC).
 * Then please do defend it. Please tell us how it agrees with the notability guidelines. Moray An Par (talk) 15:55, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 02:47, 15 May 2011 (UTC)


 * The Augustinian Mirror should be redirected in this page. Since the USA Publications is the publisher of The Augustinian Mirror, I would like to suggest that the latter page be nominated for deletion and that the USA Publications page remain. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Adrian attacks (talk • contribs) 08:30, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I have listed the page as per your request. The discussion is here Articles for deletion/The Augustinian Mirror. Szzuk (talk) 08:42, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Don't Delete. First, I would like to thank Szzuk for nominating The Augustinian Mirror Page for deletion. The USA Publications should remain a page. I have already merged the information and references from The Augustinian Mirror page with the USA Publications page. I am also trying to compile more references so that the data is the page will be verifiable. Again, Thank you very much. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Adrian attacks (talk • contribs) 08:53, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Don't Delete. As to notability, the materials published by the USA Publications reach selected schools throughout the country, the National Library of the Philippines, the Vatican (as stated in the article). Some alumni are also notable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Adrian attacks (talk • contribs) 09:00, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Please don't forget to sign your comments. That is adding four tildes ( ~ ) after your statements. As for your sources, please present them soon or your contributions might go to waste when an administrator determines that this discussion has reached consensus. As for the alumni, notability is not inheritable per WP:INHERIT. Reading other invalid reasons for notability in that page might also interest you. Moray An Par (talk) 09:17, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. I acknowledge what Moray An Par has to say. Our publication will do its best to provide non-bias information and quality references soon. The publication, I believe meets WP:NGO standards since the publication won national competitions in the past. The publication also conducts community works that lead to national development.Adrian attacks (talk) 11:59, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.