Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/USB Easy Transfer Cable SDK or API


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:18, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

USB Easy Transfer Cable SDK or API

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable product. While not blatantly promotional, the material here is more of the user's guide variety rather than a description of a notable product. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:02, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  13:57, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 16:30, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 16:30, 24 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete too many style problems and lack of sources means a merge would not be worth it. Subject already has a place in Easy Transfer Cable which also needs sourcing and explaining what those acronyms mean. Way too soon to spin off that stub section to its own article. W Nowicki (talk) 17:51, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. No evidence device is notable. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:57, 24 November 2013 (UTC).
 * Why delete?, I have used, very good, SDK is free, what is promotional? This description of a notable product,not user's guide, the user's guide of the product has more than 50 pages,guide user use the sdk with VS6.0,VS2008,VS2010,Linux C/C++,Delphi,Java, the articles and user's guide completely different. In order to monopolize the market, all manufacturers do not provide API, developers need the SDK, the SDK is noteworthy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.1.13.185 (talk) 02:22, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.