Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/USFA Custom Shop


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merged & redirected to U.S. Fire Arms Mfg. Co.. --Stormie (talk) 08:45, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

USFA Custom Shop

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Looks like a blatant advert to me. It is mentioned in the U.S. Fire Arms Mfg. Co. article; that would seem sufficient. &mdash; RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 18:55, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge to U.S. Fire Arms Mfg. Co.. There is not enough independently verifiable information available to populate a separate article; most of the information in the article is self-referenced, ie from the company's website. It should be edited for editorializing and advertising tone after merger. SWik78 (talk • contribs) 19:20, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge - I just checked the article to make sure it wasn't too long. Merge should be fine. LonelyBeacon (talk) 19:49, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  20:28, 14 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment There's an American Rifleman 2002 article which describes the NRA--Charlton Heston gun, but the only reference I can find to this published article is a blog posting (sheesh). I have been unable to retrieve[d (23:40 UTC, 15 July 2008)] the back issue.  I added a link to the Cody Firearms Museum digital archive which illustrates the Cheney gun.  It's a challenge documenting custom work by its nature, since reviews focus on production work broadly available.  Therefore, I tried to show only the most significant works to illustrate this article.  I'm not opposed to a merge if everyone concurs that is the best course of action. Newportm (talk) 21:35, 14 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep will also support Merge.--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 23:02, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge seems most appropriate. Doesn't seem like an advert to me, but is probably best included in the parent organization's article, instead of being a separate article that stands on its own. -- Yaf (talk) 20:50, 17 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.