Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/USM Alger–CR Belouizdad derby


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sam Walton (talk) 17:48, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

USM Alger–CR Belouizdad derby

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Algiers Derby is an example of a notable rivalry. These ones aren't. Rivalries are not inherently notable (see WP:NRIVALRY); these ones clearly fail WP:GNG unless significant coverage from independent and reliable sources can be found. Please note that, at the moment, none of these are 'articles' and are merely just a collection of results with no context or history whatsoever. See WP:NOTSTATS as to why this is against Wikipedia policy also. Spiderone 10:43, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages because of the exact same reasons:





Spiderone 10:43, 26 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  10:47, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  10:47, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  10:47, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone  10:47, 26 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete all - no evidence of notability. Eldumpo (talk) 16:19, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 18:13, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete all - fail WP:NRIVALRY, no evidence of GNG in any instance. Simply because two teams play each other regularly does not create a de facto rivalry and even if there is a rivalry, it has to be demonstrated that this has received significant, reliable coverage as a notion in itself, not simply the synthesis of a series of match reports. Fenix down (talk) 08:38, 27 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.